Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tom Place's avatar

When my Dad hit some success back in the 70s he did as many other did and still do, purchased a Rolex. He put the dressy Seiko he wore in Vietnam in a drawer and wore his gold Presidential for the next twenty years, and I can't ever recall it being off his wrist. He'd go to work with it on, landscape, oil changes, fix our broken bike chains, scuba dive, swim in the pools and oceans on vacation... everything. I think it's because of this that I don't ever shy away from wearing my watches for anything and everything. They're made to be worn, and they can take a beating. There's nothing cooler than seeing someone with a beat to hell dress watch on their wrist. Great write up as usual, Heaton!

Expand full comment
Saszon's avatar

I understand the attitude, I mirror it when it comes to tool watches. See, for growing up in the 90s and 2000s, it was difficult not to embrace smartwatches as a gym instrument or a wrist diving computer for scuba. As such, "rough" luxury watches always seemed like an oxymoron for me. It took some time - and some new sports such as yacht sailing - to embrace the idea of an analogue, less functional function watch. To embrace their slower pace. Appreciate their history.

A dress watch, on the other hand, was always useful, never questioned. Something worn with a suit, useufl in a way a tie or a cufflink is. And since I work in diplomacy the least formal thing I wear Monday to Friday (or used to before the pandemic...) is a blazer. Hence, the dress watch is entirely functional to me.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts